Online Books Download The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere:An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society Free
Itemize Books To The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere:An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society
| Original Title: | Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft |
| ISBN: | 0262581086 (ISBN13: 9780262581080) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Literary Awards: | APSA Benjamin E. Lippincott Award (2009), J. A. Hollon palkinto (2005) |
Jürgen Habermas
Paperback | Pages: 328 pages Rating: 3.87 | 1823 Users | 49 Reviews
Description In Pursuance Of Books The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere:An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society
This is Jürgen Habermas's most concrete historical-sociological book and one of the key contributions to political thought in the postwar period. It will be a revelation to those who have known Habermas only through his theoretical writing to find his later interests in problems of legitimation and communication foreshadowed in this lucid study of the origins, nature, and evolution of public opinion in democratic societies.
Details Based On Books The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere:An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society
| Title | : | The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere:An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society |
| Author | : | Jürgen Habermas |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 328 pages |
| Published | : | August 28th 1991 by MIT Press (first published 1962) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Sociology. Nonfiction. History. Theory. Politics |
Rating Based On Books The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere:An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society
Ratings: 3.87 From 1823 Users | 49 ReviewsColumn Based On Books The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere:An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society
Is hard to read this book, the writing is very complicated. But if you read the book with someone it might be a very interesting book. Habermas looks at the radical moment during the rise of the Bourgeoisie family and society and their struggle against the feudal order. In this moment there seems to be the enlightenment promise of holding power accountable and making it more transparent. However as the book draws to close he asserts that this promise faded away and rather you have anI gave this book four stars because it is well considered and offers some valuable insights concerning the social organization of public opinion. However, not only are there questionable depictions of the historical account of the "public sphere," but I cannot accept the normative indictment on social organization. Habermas paints a convincing picture of what he considers the ideal form of civic participation of 18th century white culture. I object to its limitations though. It is very exclusive
Just fantastic. I'm not saying I think Habermas gets everything right, at least not in this book, but he lays out the rise of the bourgeois public sphere quite usefully. Read this text, and then look at Calhoun's [ED] Habermas and the Public Sphere, especially Fraser's chapter. Later Habermas clears up a lot of it, but his later work takes a lot of time to get through.
This was a bit of a slog to get through, but I feel like I now know why it is cited so much. So much good stuff here in terms of how commonly accepted myths for instance of critical public debate elide political and personal realities. It traces both the establishment of the public sphere (at least as ideology) and it's dissolution. It would be particularly useful for people interested in literary taste (Jesi), performance (Elliott), or history as epoch. Read this, but buy a bag of m&ms to
I can certainly see why this is an important book to political scientists and philosophers. It was heavy on the philosophy side, commenting on political philosophers like Hobbes, Locke, Kant, Marx, Rousseau, Montesquieu, Mill, and Tocqueville and their contributions to scholarly thought on the public sphere.With my research interests, the sections on the proliferation of popular culture and advertising (and the insidious pursuit of leisure) and their contributions to the dismantling of the
Did I understand it? Sure, I really did. However, I would never read this book unless it were required for a course. Perhaps translation from German to English is an excuse, but this is so terribly written. It reminds me of a graduate student trying to be smart by using fancy and unnecessary jargon. I gave it 2 stars because the actual idea of a public sphere is important and other scholars have written nice books based off Habermas theory.
This is the ur-text of publics theory. I'm glad I read it, like I'm glad when I eat healthy food.
0 Comments