Download Free The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists Audio Books
The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists 
From time to time, I like to check out what Christian apologists are saying, especially in response to "the New Atheists". Zacharias is a name I have heard before. And at 3 hours on hoopla audio, this one seemed worth a look. Nothing new here. The author aims his discussion primarily at Sam Harris's Letter to a Christian Nation. His stated audience is any person who's been led astray by Harris's arguments. In the end, it's the same series of arguments you always get in this kind of pop theology:
Ravi makes 4 points against atheism (What dies with it)1) Origin - Science cannot answer how everything came from nothingpg 36 why doesn't atheism take root among the masses?It might be that it offers no real answers to life's biggest and most important questions.Pg 37 Evolution does not disprove God.2) MeaningPage 39 if we are a random accident no meaning or purpose can ever exist.Why then do we long for meaning as humans?pg 39 Muggeridge says - "All news is old things happening to new people"

Horrible. Preaching to the choir. Only those who already agree and want to will not realize how bad the arguments are. Also...The End of Reason? Really? Did anyone consider what a terribly embarrassing title that is? Hes going to use Reason to argue for...the end of Reason?Too many people have probably read this book without first reading Harris (or at least, without reading him very carefully and with an open mind). Im not looking to defend atheism so much as Im trying to show some examples of
I'm not sure I get the logical flow of this book, if there is one.
I saw glowing reviews of this book. It was recommended to me for Ravi Zacharias's "intelligent response" to Sam Harris's Letter to a Christian Nation.First, I am biased. Everyone is. A big part of why I didn't like the book is probably because I'm an atheist, and I've heard arguments like Zacharias's for a long time. Also, it began with an introduction by Lee Strobel, whose Case for Faith already made me groan and shudder in revulsion. Not because I disagree with his conclusions (which I do),
A response to Sam Harris' "Letter to a Christian Nation" - while there's flashes of brilliance here, I think pulling apart Harris' argumentation is a bit like shooting fish in a barrel. Harris is so angry & bitter that his arguments lunge wildly and often without thinking through the implications of the point he is making... Ravi Zacharias points those things out in the book.My reaction to the book as a whole is two-fold:1. I don't think it is a terribly good apologetic for atheists
Ravi Zacharias
Hardcover | Pages: 143 pages Rating: 4.02 | 2135 Users | 196 Reviews

Specify Books During The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists
Original Title: | The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists |
ISBN: | 0310282519 (ISBN13: 9780310282518) |
Edition Language: | English |
Rendition Toward Books The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists
When you pray, are you talking to a God who exists? Or is God nothing more than your “imaginary friend,” like a playmate contrived by a lonely and imaginative child?When author Sam Harris attacked Christianity in Letter to a Christian Nation, reviewers called the book “marvelous” and a generation of readers—hundreds of thousands of them—were drawn to his message. Deeply troubled, Dr. Ravi Zacharias knew that he had to respond. In The End of Reason, Zacharias underscores the dependability of the Bible along with his belief in the power and goodness of God. He confidently refutes Harris’s claims that God is nothing more than a figment of one’s imagination and that Christians regularly practice intolerance and hatred around the globe. If you found Sam Harris’s Letter to a Christian Nation compelling, the book you are holding is exactly what you need. Dr. Zacharias exposes “the utter bankruptcy of this worldview.” And if you haven’t read Harris’ book, Ravi’s response remains a powerful, passionate, irrefutably sound set of arguments for Christian thought. The clarity and hope in these pages reach out to readers who know and follow God as well as to those who reject God.Describe Out Of Books The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists
Title | : | The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists |
Author | : | Ravi Zacharias |
Book Format | : | Hardcover |
Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 143 pages |
Published | : | May 11th 2008 by Zondervan |
Categories | : | Nonfiction. Religion. Christianity. Philosophy. Theology |
Rating Out Of Books The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists
Ratings: 4.02 From 2135 Users | 196 ReviewsEvaluate Out Of Books The End of Reason: A Response to the New Atheists
This is one of the worst books I've read in recent memory. I was brought to anger at times by the ridiculousness of Ravi's argumentation precisely because I expected so much better from him. If the book had a fraction of its content devoted to substance rather than Trojan horses, ad hominems, cute anecdotes and fables, and general reactionary hollowness then it may have been worth the read. While you can't judge a book by its cover, you often can by its content's functional bookends. If you wantFrom time to time, I like to check out what Christian apologists are saying, especially in response to "the New Atheists". Zacharias is a name I have heard before. And at 3 hours on hoopla audio, this one seemed worth a look. Nothing new here. The author aims his discussion primarily at Sam Harris's Letter to a Christian Nation. His stated audience is any person who's been led astray by Harris's arguments. In the end, it's the same series of arguments you always get in this kind of pop theology:
Ravi makes 4 points against atheism (What dies with it)1) Origin - Science cannot answer how everything came from nothingpg 36 why doesn't atheism take root among the masses?It might be that it offers no real answers to life's biggest and most important questions.Pg 37 Evolution does not disprove God.2) MeaningPage 39 if we are a random accident no meaning or purpose can ever exist.Why then do we long for meaning as humans?pg 39 Muggeridge says - "All news is old things happening to new people"

Horrible. Preaching to the choir. Only those who already agree and want to will not realize how bad the arguments are. Also...The End of Reason? Really? Did anyone consider what a terribly embarrassing title that is? Hes going to use Reason to argue for...the end of Reason?Too many people have probably read this book without first reading Harris (or at least, without reading him very carefully and with an open mind). Im not looking to defend atheism so much as Im trying to show some examples of
I'm not sure I get the logical flow of this book, if there is one.
I saw glowing reviews of this book. It was recommended to me for Ravi Zacharias's "intelligent response" to Sam Harris's Letter to a Christian Nation.First, I am biased. Everyone is. A big part of why I didn't like the book is probably because I'm an atheist, and I've heard arguments like Zacharias's for a long time. Also, it began with an introduction by Lee Strobel, whose Case for Faith already made me groan and shudder in revulsion. Not because I disagree with his conclusions (which I do),
A response to Sam Harris' "Letter to a Christian Nation" - while there's flashes of brilliance here, I think pulling apart Harris' argumentation is a bit like shooting fish in a barrel. Harris is so angry & bitter that his arguments lunge wildly and often without thinking through the implications of the point he is making... Ravi Zacharias points those things out in the book.My reaction to the book as a whole is two-fold:1. I don't think it is a terribly good apologetic for atheists
0 Comments